Conroe ISD Superintendent Dr. Curtis Null unexpectedly withdrew a proposal to end the district’s dual language program after a wave of public backlash. Parents and educators criticized the lack of transparency, with many only learning about the decision two days before the board meeting.
.jpg)
In a surprising turn of events, Conroe ISD Superintendent Dr. Curtis Null withdrew the administration’s recommendation to eliminate the district’s dual language program during a school board meeting on Tuesday night. The decision followed an outpouring of opposition from parents, teachers, and students, many of whom criticized the lack of transparency surrounding the proposal.
The dual language program, offered at five elementary schools and two intermediate schools, immerses students in both English and Spanish instruction. Designed to promote bilingual proficiency, the program includes an equal number of native English and Spanish speakers learning core subjects in both languages. Parents praised its academic benefits, while educators argued that discontinuing it would harm students and diminish valuable language learning opportunities.
More than 80 community members attended the board meeting, with the majority voicing unwavering support for the program. Parents, teachers, and students expressed frustration that they were given little notice—learning of the potential cut just two days before the meeting.
“This time last year, the district was presenting bilingual certifications for our students,” said Michelle Shosa, a parent of a student in the program. “And now, with no warning, we see an agenda item about cutting the program? No communication, no explanation, no justification.”
Educators echoed these concerns. “I am so ashamed that this came out of nowhere,” said Liz Morford, a teacher in the program. “Not only did you let me down as an educator, but you let down my students.”
Following nearly two hours of passionate testimony and resounding cheers for pro-dual language speakers, Null directly addressed the audience. “I am not proud of our process,” he admitted. “I am not proud of the way it was handled.”
While the program remains intact, parents and educators remain vigilant, urging district officials to improve communication and ensure transparency in future decisions affecting students.
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)